AI in the Workplace: Employer Liability and Compliance in the Age of Automation
In today's corporate world, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is silently revolutionizing HR departments. Employers are increasingly using AI for various functions, including applicant screening and employee evaluations. While AI offers efficiency, it also brings legal complexities, especially under regulations like New York City's Local Law 144 and guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
The Reality of AI in HR Operations
Many employers, perhaps unknowingly, are relying on AI-driven tools in their HR functions. These tools, ranging from applicant tracking systems to employee performance analysis software, are often provided by third-party HR vendors. They use AI to sort through resumes, predict employee success, and even guide decisions on promotions and terminations. The catch is, that many employers might not be fully aware that their standard HR software incorporates AI, or understand the extent of its use in their decision-making processes. And yet, under current and emerging law, employers may still be liable for usage of a vendor’s AI-powered automated decision tools (ADT) if the ADT produces a discriminatory result.
Ignorance Is Not Bliss: Employer Responsibilities
In other words, the critical point for employers to note is that ignorance of the AI functionalities in their HR software does not exempt them from legal responsibilities. Employers must be proactive in understanding not only the software they use but also how AI is integrated into these tools and the implications of its usage.
Navigating Legal Responsibilities with AI Tools
In the realm of AI-driven hiring and employment decisions, current laws hold employers responsible for any discriminatory outcomes, even if these are a result of third-party software. Here's how:
Responsibility Despite Outsourcing: If an AI tool, designed or administered by an HR vendor, results in discriminatory hiring practices or workplace decisions, the employer could still face legal consequences under various anti-discrimination laws.
EEOC Guidelines on Title VII and ADA: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has made it clear that under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers are liable for discriminatory outcomes from AI tools, regardless of whether they were developed internally or externally. Employers must ensure these tools do not disproportionately exclude protected classes and must provide reasonable accommodations as required by the ADA.
Local Law 144 – A Case Study from NYC: New York City’s Local Law 144 exemplifies how specific jurisdictions are tackling AI in hiring. This law mandates bias audits and transparent disclosures if AI tools are used in employment decisions. It emphasizes that the onus is on the employer to ensure compliance, irrespective of whether the AI tool is vendor-supplied.
Local Law 144: Detailed Employer Responsibilities in NYC
NYC's Local Law 144, effective July 5th, 2023, specifically targets employers using Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDTs) in hiring and promotion:
Applicability: The law applies to AEDTs used for jobs linked to an NYC office, including remote positions.
Mandatory Bias Audits: Employers must conduct annual bias audits of these AI tools and notify employees and candidates about their usage.
EEOC's Technical Guidance on AI Tools
The EEOC's technical documents on Title VII and ADA implications offer crucial insights:
Title VII and Employer Liability: The EEOC clarifies that employers are responsible under Title VII if AI tools discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, even if the tools are vendor-supplied. Employers should verify with vendors whether AI tools have been evaluated for potential biases and consider alternatives if they could result in a lower selection rate for protected individuals.
ADA Compliance: Similarly, under the ADA, employers are liable for discrimination against individuals with disabilities due to AI tools. This includes the responsibility for providing reasonable accommodations related to the use of these tools.
Proactive Measures for Employers
Given these laws and best practices, employers should consider taking the following steps:
Understand AI Integration: First, an audit of technology in the workplace - determine which tools an employer is using incorporate AI. Fully grasp how AI is integrated into their HR tools and the implications of its use.
Regular Bias Audits: Conduct thorough, independent bias audits of AI tools, focusing on their impact on protected classes.
Vendor Diligence: Ensure that AI tool vendors have undertaken appropriate bias evaluations and comply with anti-discrimination laws.
Comprehensive Training: Train HR teams on the legal and ethical aspects of AI in the workplace and of AI tool usage.
Policy Development: Develop clear policies for AI tool usage, ensuring legal compliance and ethical standards.
Stay Informed: Keep abreast of evolving laws and regulations concerning AI in the workplace, including local laws like NYC's Local Law 144 and federal guidelines.
Responsible AI Usage in HR
In conclusion, navigating the complexities of AI use in HR requires a proactive and informed approach. By understanding the legal responsibilities under regulations like NYC's Local Law 144 and the EEOC's guidelines, employers can effectively manage the risks and benefits of AI, ensuring both legal compliance and ethical use of technology in HR processes.
Ready to revolutionize your HR strategies with cutting-edge AI coaching and training? Wagner Legal is your trusted partner in empowering HR professionals with confidential, tailored solutions. Elevate your team's capabilities, streamline processes, and stay ahead in the dynamic landscape of human resources. Contact us today to embark on a transformative journey that unlocks the full potential of your workforce. Harness the power of innovation with Wagner Legal.
